|
 |
A King in New York
|
by 20th Century Fox
Sales Rank: 28410
Price: $19.98
|
|
|
<I>A King in New York</I>, Charlie Chaplin's penultimate film--featuring his final starring performance--was made in 1957 but wasn't officially released in America until the '70s, when it, surprisingly enough, won an Oscar for Chaplin's score. What took so long? Thanks to his politics and unorthodox personal life, Chaplin was pretty roundly hated by the late '50s, but had the movie been better, someone might've brought it stateside sooner. Chaplin plays King Shahdov of Estrovia, on the lam when revolution grips his homeland. In New York, despite the occasional indignity, he's treated as royalty until he takes a stand against the commie-hunters, a plotline that hit way too close to home at the time (Chaplin, remember, was ahead of everyone in attacking Hitler when he made <I>The Great Dictator</I>). There's one inspired bit, as Shahdov orders dinner over the din of a supper club, but overall, the satire is strident, and Chaplin's takes on such things as technology and pop music make him look decidedly like an old fogy. <I>--David Kronke</I>
Viewer Reviews
Of the two movies in this DVD, "A King in New York" is clearly the better one. There were moments in it when I laughed out loud. They mainly occurred during Chaplin(the King)'s exploration of New York City. The previews at the movie theater and his experience at the night club were, I suppose, Chaplin's comments on how the Arts had commercialized themselves. There were a few other jokes in reference to advertizing that worked fairly well. However, the movie eventually revealed its' purpose as a condemnation of the Rosenberg Trial (Wow, I didn't see that one coming). Chaplin gave an acceptable performance and I came away reasonably glad that I had seen it. No need to watch it again, though.
The second film in the DVD, "A Woman of Paris" was made about 30 years earlier. It did not star Charlie Chaplin (who DID direct it) and there was even a disclaimer in this silent movie that clarified that Mr. Chaplin would NOT be appearing in the movie. This was a reasonably well-made story of the innocent young beauty whose circumstances led her down the wrong path. It is Not a comedy. In fact it's rather tragic although it ends with an upbeat message. The actors were unknown to me except for Adolphe Menjou who seems to have made a career of being a supporting actor. The director obviously meant to create an emotional story. However, Chaplin the actor was far better at creating emotions than was Chaplin the director. Chaplin the actor could create a story with little, if any, dialogue. Chaplin, the director, needed a lot of dialogue cards to set the stage and enhance the story. Chaplin directed himself to much success. That's because he had better talent to work with than he did in "A Woman of Paris".
Back To Top
|
A King in New York
Available from Amazon
|
|
NOTICE: All product prices, availability, and specifications
are subject to verification by their respective retailers.
Copyright © 2009, Dominant Systems Corporation
info@HowlingVideo.com
Privacy Policy
Last Modified : 1-6-2009
|
